Comments on: Linq to objects for .NET 2 available http://rogeralsing.com/2008/03/31/linq-to-objects-for-net-2-available/ Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:35:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Roger Alsing http://rogeralsing.com/2008/03/31/linq-to-objects-for-net-2-available/#comment-131 Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:58:55 +0000 http://rogeralsing.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-131 Yeah I just checked it out and they got pretty much a full implementation of the in mem engine.
all the list extensions etc.

So if you need Linq to Objects for 2.0 that would be the way to go.

]]> By: Roger Alsing http://rogeralsing.com/2008/03/31/linq-to-objects-for-net-2-available/#comment-130 Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:48:53 +0000 http://rogeralsing.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-130 Oh, I didnt know about the other project.
My guess is that LinqBridge is far more complete since it seems to be a serious project.

While mine was pretty much a clean up of my old blog sample.

I havent checked yet, but thats my guess atleast.

]]> By: Alexey Romanov http://rogeralsing.com/2008/03/31/linq-to-objects-for-net-2-available/#comment-129 Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:08:54 +0000 http://rogeralsing.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-129 Sorry if this being submitted twice… How does it compare to LINQBride (http://www.albahari.com/nutshell/linqbridge.html)?

]]> By: Anders Hesselbom http://rogeralsing.com/2008/03/31/linq-to-objects-for-net-2-available/#comment-127 Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:56:56 +0000 http://rogeralsing.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-127 Very well done!

]]>